- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 22:36:15 +0000
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Alex Mogilevsky <snip> > - addressing new important use cases <even more snipping> +1 on this. Even if not new or important, documenting the use-cases that support the proposed changes would be very helpful. To the extent there *are* implementations of the current draft, some of its shortcoming might even be demo-able with testcases ? The set of use-cases that informed standard features are often poorly documented, if at all. While I don't expect this draft to change this, it has been partially implemented so they would be even more relevant. And it ought to be a lot easier to achieve consensus on changing a spec if there already are patterns out there that clearly demonstrate the shortcomings of the current solution. Apologies if they've been covered at various points but even a summary of the relevant input that was considered would be great !
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 22:36:52 UTC