- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 20:45:28 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 05/21/2010 08:22 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 5/21/10 7:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> In that case, what's your mental model of the box tree in this case: >>> >>> <div style="display: table"> >>> <div style="display: table-cell"/> >>> <div style="position: absolute"/> >>> <div style="display: table-row"/> >>> </div> >>> >>> What are the siblings of the absolutely positioned box? What is its >>> parent? >>> What are the siblings' parents? Why does any of that make any sense? >> >> Excellent question. To the spec! (Or rather, the proposed spec text >> from fantasai.) >> >> By rule 2.1, the markup is repaired by wrapping the first div, and >> only the first div, in an anonymous table row. > > Hmmm.... yeah, ok. That would be a bug in fantasai's spec, then. Actually, it's a feature. :) I deliberately left out handling of abspos elements entirely. (I actually deleted text about abspos elements from an earlier draft before posting to the list.) ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 22 May 2010 03:46:06 UTC