- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:58:49 -0700
- To: Gregers Gram Rygg <gregersrygg@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
I am not sure, but I think the staff contacts ought to discuss this. We perhaps should have a session at TPAC where we talk about the increasing leakiness of the 'virtual pointer/virtual keyboard' logical interface. People are talking about speech input as well (what do those who cannot talk do?). On May 19, 2010, at 6:33 , Gregers Gram Rygg wrote: > Hi David, > > Sorry for my extremely late answer. > > How do you suggest we proceed to solve this problem? > > Gregers Rygg > > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:24 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: >> I am a little concerned we not get too 'physical' here. Our current input model is of a logical keyboard and logical pointing device, but these can be physically instantiated in a number of ways (e.g. typing by voice recognition, pointing by keyboard keys). We have concepts like 'focus' and 'enter characters'. >> >> This is important because, among other things, accessibility relies on finding alternative physical ways to meet the logical interface. >> >> I am a little concerned that we are having this discussion somewhat piecemeal at the W3C, as well (various groups are discussing 'touch' and I am not sure they have the same model). >> >> David Singer >> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 16:59:26 UTC