- From: Eli Morris-Heft <eli.morris.heft@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 18:53:33 -0500
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Alex Meiburg <timeroot.alex@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 23:54:28 UTC
Would it be unacceptable to just say that, when using #rrggbbaa notation, the aa part maps 0x00-0xFF directly onto 0.0 - 1.0 (that is, take the aa value, convert it to decimal, and divide by 255), and if an author needs to specify a color with /exactly/ 0.5 opacity (or another float that is not represented exactly by one of the 256 values 0x00-0xFF) for some reason, he or she just has to use rgba() (or hsla()) notation? I think that most authors using (or rather, who would use) #rrggbbaa notation, and I am among this company, would be just fine with 0x80 representing 0.50196... Eli Morris-Heft
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 23:54:28 UTC