Re: Selectors, vendor prefixes (again...) and IE9

On Saturday 15 May 2010, Brian Manthos wrote:
> I'll toss another opinion onto the pile.
> 
> 3. When W3C specification rewinds to less than CR -- the unprefixed
> property should be disabled
> 
This rule shouldn't be necessary. The process for making CR is a lot different 
today than it was in 2001. Hopefully this shouldn't be problem in the future.

Also I think your suggestion would force "text-shadow" and a few other 
wellknown properties to require vendor prefix. That is unlikely to happen. 
Removing ::selection doesn't really matter, but the general idea behind 
changing it now is wrong.

`Allan

Received on Saturday, 15 May 2010 07:48:57 UTC