- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 10:48:55 -0700
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
On Friday 2010-05-14 19:27 +0200, Daniel Glazman wrote: > Without that, we won't be able to move on and if we (hear the > WG) can't make a decision here, the rule is simple: vendor > prefix mandatory. I don't think it's that simple. First, I don't think one of the co-chairs of the working group has the power to revoke, by himself, a Call for Implementations issued by the WG / the W3C. Second, I think that unless the working group has a better system for moving things to call-for-implementations faster (i.e., with a lighter weight process), browsers are going to be under a lot of pressure to ignore the working group and drop prefixes when things are reasonably interoperable. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Friday, 14 May 2010 17:49:25 UTC