- From: Alex Meiburg <timeroot.alex@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 17:37:52 -0700
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTinRFVDCMyrPkKE5ntPnmiaoMs3qVpy4gOUOR1Ma@mail.gmail.com>
I wouldn't mind it. Maybe as an opt-in choice in the user preferences for the browser? "Never", "Always", "Ask Me", with "Never" as the default. Or "Ask Me" as a default, with a choice for "Yes", "No", and a checkbox for "remebering". It wouldn't have to be an annoying dialog, it could be in the form of a notification bar at the top. ~6 out of 5 statisticians say that the number of statistics that either make no sense or use ridiculous timescales at all has dropped over 164% in the last 5.62474396842 years. On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > You really want the browser throwing up dialogs because someone used a CSS > rule in a web page? > > Simon > > On May 12, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Alex Meiburg wrote: > > Maybe if the browser prompted the user first, asking if it was okay? > Somewhat like the Windows "Administrator approval required" popups? > > ~6 out of 5 statisticians say that the number of statistics that either > make no sense or use ridiculous timescales at all has dropped over 164% in > the last 5.62474396842 years. > > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > >> No, those view modes are only descriptive of the current environment. >> >> I really don't want web pages making my browser windows transparent. I >> think this is up to the UA. >> >> Simon >> >> On May 12, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Alex Meiburg wrote: >> >> But can "view-mode: floating" be set by the developer in anyway? How does >> one trigger this state? >> >> ~6 out of 5 statisticians say that the number of statistics that either >> make no sense or use ridiculous timescales at all has dropped over 164% in >> the last 5.62474396842 years. >> >> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: >> >>> On May 11, 2010, at 9:18 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: >>> >>> > On May 11, 2010, at 7:21 PM, Alex Meiburg wrote: >>> > >>> >> I was wondering how a transparent background should be rendered bu >>> user agents. Suppose the body element (and perhaps the html element too) had >>> a semi-transparent value - should they be cast against a white background, >>> or should the window actually appear transparent as well, allowing the >>> desktop/other windows to show though? >>> >> >>> >> If the latter, how should this be rendered on mobile platforms? >>> >> >>> >> Personally, I would be expecting a white background, but it would be >>> interesting to have translucent parts of the webpage. >>> >> >>> > >>> > It would be kind of cool to allow translucency of the viewport (would >>> you see other tabs too?). In Webkit, you can set HTML and BODY tags to >>> transparent, but you still get white. Maybe it is some sort of security >>> restriction, to prevent one page from appearing to be part of another that >>> it is hovering over. >>> >>> WebKit allows a transparent background in certain situations (Dashcode >>> widgets use this, for example). I think the initial viewport color should be >>> up to the user agent. >>> >>> The recently-discussed view modes proposal has a mode, "floating", in >>> which the background is transparent: >>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/view-mode/#view-modes> >>> >>> Simon >>> >>> >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 13 May 2010 00:38:26 UTC