- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 19:47:47 -0700
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- Cc: Adam Del Vecchio <adam.delvecchio@go-techo.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Now, a question of intuitiveness. In z-index, higher numbers make >> boxes show up on top, or "first" conceptually. Lower numbers are >> *painted* first, though. Which is the most intuitive notion of >> "first" here? That is, would you expect a higher or lower number to >> put a given flexbox child first? > > > Lower numbers should come first, because content order gives increasing > z-order, so it should give increasing flexbox-order as well. > > Also, having elements appear in increasing numeric order simply makes more > sense, surely. Sure, just running a sanity check. Sticking with the current operation, then. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 02:48:39 UTC