- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 19:38:55 -0700
- To: julien.cayzac@gmail.com
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Julien Cayzac <julien.cayzac@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> we'll just use the existing <aspect-ratio> type. > > Your use of future tense cheers me up :-) > Does that mean the Chrome team is "officially" interested in implementing > this? No, I speak entirely for myself unless I make it clear that I speak for the team. > I am quite new to the list so I don't really know how this WG works: do you > have to meet with the other parties to discuss its inclusion or will > somebody have to write a proposal..? > > Is there any chance for this to be included in CSS3 at all or will it be in > a later revision? What ends up happening is that, at some point, the editor of a relevant draft chooses to put it in, possibly first running it past the rest of the group either on the list or in a telcon. Whether it goes in one of the modules identified as "level 3" isn't really important; there is no single "CSS3" for it to be a part of. It would just be a part of some module, whether at level 3 or 4. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 02:39:47 UTC