Those changes sound quite good to me. On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > I feel pretty strongly that this sort of change is worth breaking the > current experimental implementations in Gecko and Webkit. > To be honest, we probably want to rewrite our implementation anyway, or rather do a new implementation of the new spec alongside our legacy XUL box layout. However, it would be nice to at least be able to map existing flexbox functionality cleanly into the new model. It seems like that will be possible. Hmm, will your flexunits proposal allow authors to set an absolute preferred width and a flex width on the same element? Rob -- "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]
Received on Sunday, 9 May 2010 08:57:08 UTC