- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 23:49:33 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: julien.cayzac@gmail.com, www-style@w3.org
Le 06/05/10 19:23, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : > Is there any reason for this? I'd think it would just use the normal > rules for resolving width/height. Whichever one normally takes > precedence does so, and then aspect-ratio is consulted to constrain > the other one. If we wanted to change which dimension was used as the > "primary" input for the sizing algo, we should do that separately > rather than shoving it into a nominally unrelated property. Televisions preserving the aspect-ratio of the image on a screen of another aspect-ratio (4/3 on a 16/9 tv for instance) often offer the two modes (black strips around height preservation or clipping of width preservation. </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2010 21:50:07 UTC