- From: Julien Cayzac <julien.cayzac@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 22:57:46 +0900
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: >> There is no need to introduce a function, the value can be just "4/3", >> as per CSS grammar: > Yeah, well, hum. We recently said (during our Cupertino meeting IIRC) > that one of the only existing use case of this is the font shorthand > and that extending the use of slash inside values should probably be > limited... That happened during a discussion where it's proposed to > reuse that slash for another property. Hi Daniel, I wrote that because that's the notation used by (min-|max-)(device-)aspect-ratio in http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/ and because I think it's a bad idea to specify different notations for aspect-ratios. Elements' aspect-ratio and media queries' aspect-ratio should have a consistent syntax as their refer to the same concept... Cheers, Julien. -- Julien Cayzac http://julien.cayzac.name/ skype://jcayzac?chat
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2010 13:58:42 UTC