- From: Erik Arvidsson <arv@chromium.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 02:33:39 +0000
- To: Alex Meiburg <timeroot.alex@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <k2n34df39071005051933i6d2135efjcbc749b3f0ba715d@mail.gmail.com>
I modified my local build of webkit to remove the limitations on the timing function and everything just works (famous last words). erik On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 19:20, Alex Meiburg <timeroot.alex@gmail.com> wrote: > Nice necro. ;-) > > I thought about it, I suppose it wouldn't have to be invertible then, would > it? Only single-valued as it stands, but bounce animations shouldn't break > anything... > > As was already meantioned, though, limiting the coordinates to the unit > square prevent and bouncing. It seems that one could have legitimate > functions, then, with the coordinates extended over the [0,1] range in the x > or y direction. > > ~6 out of 5 statisticians say that the number of statistics that either > make no sense or use ridiculous timescales at all has dropped over 164% in > the last 5.62474396842 years. > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Erik Arvidsson <arv@chromium.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 17:29, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Within that range, you're guaranteed that the curve will be >>> monotonically increasing (or maybe just non-decreasing?), and thus is >>> invertible. >> >> >> Why is that a requirement? Removing the limitation allows bounce like >> animations without the need to switch to using keyframes. >> >> -- >> erik >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2010 02:34:28 UTC