Re: [css3-background] vastly different takes on "blur"

On Jun 23, 2010, at 6:14 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>> I'd still be interested in knowing if people think that a "10px  
>> transition
>> from 100% opaque to 0% opaque" should be inclusive of a 100% pixel  
>> and/or a
>> 0% pixel within the 10px. I think here on the list we've be viewing  
>> it as
>> exclusive of those endpoints.
>
> I consider it exclusive.  I expect a black shadow on white background
> to not hit #fff or #000 until just *outside* of the blur area.

Me too. So that's two of us. I'd guess it's most of us on this thread  
even. And I'd hope that a more widely cast survey would back that up.