W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2010

Re: [css3-background] vastly different takes on "blur"

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:02:33 -0700
Message-ID: <4C22AEA9.6050803@inkedblade.net>
To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
CC: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 06/23/2010 01:41 PM, Brian Manthos wrote:
>>> Agreed. I was thinking to include a note about that, and then ask a
>>> question such as "which of the following renderings best describe a
>>> blur of 10px (and don't cheat to see what you browser does)", and
>>> include some variations that are all based on a black shadow (for
>>> widest range of perceptiple changes to transparent). The variations
>>> would include not only one version being twice the width of the other,
>>> but also the possibility of clipping to within some range that (1% -
>>> 99%?) that a human can discriminate as different from totally opaque
>>> and totally transparent (and filling the 10px with that), and also
>>> testing whether or not people consider a pixel of 100% and/or 0% to be
>>> part of the countable part or not.
>> I feel that these other questions are much more easily resolved here, and I'd
>> rather keep the question as simple as possible for the one issue where we
>> really would benefit from feedback. Getting coherent answers from the web
>> design community is difficult enough as it is.
>> ~fantasai
> But that completely misses a critical point.
> With all renderings I've seen so far, the mathematical impact of the blur
> and the human perceptible impact of the blur are significantly different.

That's something we can resolve here, though: it's not something that needs
web author input. I think it's fair to presume that the measurement should
correspond to the human-perceptible range of the blur. The details of how
to spec that is something for us to work out among spec-writers and
implementors. The question we need more *author* feedback for is whether
the value refers to a blur radius or a blur distance.

Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 01:03:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:47 UTC