W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2010

Re: [css3-background] blur distance

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:35:06 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTim1uMPhZZnje5og_31A0SF3lLXAqBlpNNmcSRkD@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote:
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/csswg/css3-background/Overview.src.html.diff?r1=1.233&r2=1.234&f=h
> Can someone elaborate on the intent of this change?

Presumably to make it clearer that they mean "non-zero".  There's
sufficient possibility for confusion over whether 0 qualifies as a
"positive" number that it's often worthwhile to avoid using the term
"positive" when you mean to exclude zero.

The possibility of negative distances is already ruled out earlier in
the prose describing the possible values, so it's unambiguous.

Received on Monday, 21 June 2010 21:35:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:47 UTC