- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:38:39 -0700
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- CC: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 03/31/2010 11:42 AM, fantasai wrote: > Robert O'Callahan wrote: > >> Sounds good, but why include 'pre-line' there? IMHO spaces in pre-line > >> text should be able to stretch for justification. > > > > Good point. That should not be there! > > Here's an updated proposal based on Arron's tests... Reposting the proposal with some minor errors fixed: Here's an updated proposal based on Arron's tests that show that pre-wrap disables justification but pre-line doesn't (which makes sense): http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-53 In 16.2, replace # If the computed value of text-align is 'justify' while the computed # value of white-space is 'pre' or 'pre-line', the actual value of # text-align is set to the initial value. with | If an element has a computed value for 'white-space' of 'pre' or | 'pre-wrap', then neither the glyphs of that element's text content | nor its white space may be altered for the purpose of justification. The other paragraph that we may need is this: | If the computed value of 'text-align' is 'justify' and the computed | value of white-space is 'pre' or 'pre-wrap', then the used value | of 'text-align' is set to the initial value. Whether we add it or not depends on whether the following should be allowed to justify: <p style="text-align: justify; white-space: pre"><span style="white-space: normal">Some text here</span></p> (We have split results for implementations.) ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2010 23:39:13 UTC