W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2010

Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite Beta 1

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:35:53 -0700
Message-ID: <4C180049.7090108@inkedblade.net>
To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
CC: www-style@w3.org
On 06/14/2010 11:35 PM, John Daggett wrote:
>> I've uploaded a copy of the test suite beta to the csswg.org server:
>>     http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/
>> Please take a look and let me know if there's anything obviously
>> wrong. :) I'll be posting it to W3C tomorrow, when I get the last
>> set of bidi tests from i18n.
> How is this being built?  I pulled from the svn repo today and I only
> find the Microsoft tests in contributors/microsoft/submitted rather
> than in approved/css2.1/src.

The CSS2.1 test suite snapshots are including all the unreviewed tests
as well as the approved ones, since that is what the WG requested.
It's being built with the build scripts in
specifically, pub-css21.pl, which pulls in the relevant unreviewed
directories as arguments to the Python build system.

> The linked page includes this text:
>> Note that many of the tests require the Ahem font to be installed.
>> Without the Ahem font installed, these tests are of no value.
> As I noted back in January, this is inaccurate, the font chapter tests
> require a whole set of fonts:
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Jan/0057.html

I uploaded your fonts onto the W3C website:
If you can write a more comprehensive test file for the installation,
that checks for all the installed fonts, that would be helpful. I
think I'll write a test file for Ahem as well, since I think this was
a good idea. ;)

I do need to update the index file to mention these other fonts, though.
I'll go do that.

> I also posted a review of the fonts chapter tests back in January but
> it looks like none of those tests have been touched:
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Jan/0017.html
> I submitted a set of font reftests
> (contributors/mozilla/submitted/fontreftests), a number of which can
> be run as standalone tests but those don't appear to have made it into
> the final set of tests.

They're there! I did find your tests and build them. :)
They're also in the reftest manifest:

But I wasn't sure what to do with the tests for bold/italic synthesis,
since they didn't have pass conditions associated with them...

Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2010 22:36:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:47 UTC