On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > Gecko gives me a blur width that is about twice as wide as the authored > amount, so I still want to change that to be a more straightforward 1:1 > relationship. Yeah. Right now we make a blurred region whose width is twice the "blur radius" and which is centered on the shadow edge. Cutting that in half to match the spec could be done, but it seems a less intuitive interpretation of "radius". Our implementation has the property that the pixels affected by the blur are those whose distance from the shadow edge is less than the "blur radius". Am I alone in thinking that makes sense? Rob -- "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2010 00:14:45 UTC