Re: [css3-background] vastly different takes on "blur"

On Jun 11, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Simon Fraser <> wrote:

> On Jun 11, 2010, at 1:18 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
>> On Friday 2010-06-11 11:13 -0700, Simon Fraser wrote:
>>> Something else we need to specify somewhere is whether shadows are
>>> drawn before or after transforms.
>> Presumably this is just a question of what should happen if the
>> transform and the shadow are specified on the same element?  I tend
>> to think that the shadow probably should be transformed, just as all
>> other drawing operations for the element (its border and background)
>> are transformed.
> I agree with this. Having the shadow transformed allows us to  
> maintain compatibility with our hardware compositing code path, too,
>> If the shadow is on something inside the element with the transform,
>> I feel quite strongly that the shadow must be transformed.
> I also agree with this!
> Simon

Fine with me. Should this be put in the Transforms module, rather than  
adding a reference to it in B&B (since B&B seems to be closer to CR,  
and would be better off not refering to a WD module)?

Received on Friday, 11 June 2010 20:56:33 UTC