- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:53:44 -0700
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Jun 11, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > On Jun 11, 2010, at 1:18 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > >> On Friday 2010-06-11 11:13 -0700, Simon Fraser wrote: >>> Something else we need to specify somewhere is whether shadows are >>> drawn before or after transforms. >> >> Presumably this is just a question of what should happen if the >> transform and the shadow are specified on the same element? I tend >> to think that the shadow probably should be transformed, just as all >> other drawing operations for the element (its border and background) >> are transformed. > > I agree with this. Having the shadow transformed allows us to > maintain compatibility with our hardware compositing code path, too, > >> If the shadow is on something inside the element with the transform, >> I feel quite strongly that the shadow must be transformed. > > I also agree with this! > > Simon Fine with me. Should this be put in the Transforms module, rather than adding a reference to it in B&B (since B&B seems to be closer to CR, and would be better off not refering to a WD module)?
Received on Friday, 11 June 2010 20:56:33 UTC