W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2010

Re: [css3-background] vastly different takes on "blur"

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:18:25 -0700
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100611201825.GA11136@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Friday 2010-06-11 11:13 -0700, Simon Fraser wrote:
> Something else we need to specify somewhere is whether shadows are
> drawn before or after transforms.

Presumably this is just a question of what should happen if the
transform and the shadow are specified on the same element?  I tend
to think that the shadow probably should be transformed, just as all
other drawing operations for the element (its border and background)
are transformed.

If the shadow is on something inside the element with the transform,
I feel quite strongly that the shadow must be transformed.


L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Friday, 11 June 2010 20:19:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:47 UTC