- From: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:32:42 +1000
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 07:27:31PM -0700, fantasai wrote: > - RESOLVED: Accept dbaron's proposal for CSS2.1 issue 26 with "(see above)" > and s/specified/computed/ changes from Peter Moulder; Incidentally, I didn't actually suggest using "computed" in the text, and my preferred resolution would be s/specified 'height'/'height' value/: explicitly using the word "computed" may introduce doubt as to whether unqualified references to "the '<property>' value" in the spec might refer to something other than the computed value. But it's not too important. > ...; open a new > issue for the remaining points from Peter's email. > http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-126 I think that's supposed to be #issue-170 . Incidentally, there seems to be a mistake in the diff referenced in #issue-126: it does s/paddings/puddings/, where the author presumably wanted to do s/paddings/padding/. pjrm.
Received on Friday, 4 June 2010 05:33:18 UTC