- From: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 12:51:08 -0700
- To: W3C Emailing list for WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
What should an @import rule (or a top-level link from a document - that's in-scope, because they need to behave the same) do with data that is served with no content-type header, or an unparseable content-type header? (Assume an URI scheme that does provide HTTP-equivalent content-type data.) Mozilla happens to treat the absence of a content-type, an unparseable content-type, and a handful of 'sentinel' values that are not *supposed* to appear on the wire (but nothing prevents this) as equivalent to text/css. However, CVE-2010-0654 (see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524223 for extensive discussion) makes me think this is not a good idea. zw
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2010 19:51:42 UTC