- From: Rob Crowther <robertc@boogdesign.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:58:37 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hi All The 12th June WD states, for the border-image-slice property: "The ‘fill’ keyword, if present, causes the middle part of the border-image to be preserved. (By default it is discarded, i.e., treated as empty.)" All current implementations, as far as I can see (I've checked Firefox, Chromium and Opera) implement only the combined border-image property from the 20080910 WD which has no definition for the fill keyword. This would seem to be consistent with the dates when Mozilla and WebKit implemented it. So my interpretation of the situation is that the browsers have implemented the 20080910 WD version and will be updating to match the final version of the spec when it gets agreed. However, Opera have implemented border-image without a prefix following the 20080910 behaviour in 10.50 and later. There doesn't appear to have been too much discussion of border-image on this list recently, though there may have been before I joined it, but is it more likely we'll see the 20080910 version of border-image in the final Backgrounds & Borders Level 3, since that's what everyone seems to have implemented, or the current version? If we will end up with the current version, am I interpreting the combined syntax correctly if provide fallback this way (assuming I have an appropriate image for '...': -moz-border-image: url(...) 80 stretch; -webkit-border-image: url(...) 80 stretch; border-image: url(...) 80 fill stretch; Note that including the fill keyword breaks Opera, so I won't be doing this in practical use any time soon. Rob
Received on Saturday, 31 July 2010 21:59:06 UTC