- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:00:07 -0700
- To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, divya manian <divya.manian@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net> wrote: > Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:35 PM, fantasai >> <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >>> >>> As I mentioned, it should be painted immediately below z-index: 1, >>> so that authors can pop things out of the shadow with 'z-index'. >> >> What would happen if both a parent and a child specified an inset >> shadow? Which paints on top of which? >> >> (Presumably the parent's shadow would paint atop the child's shadow.) > > That would be a change from the usual approach taken in the stacking > model, where document tree order is king when all else is equal. Agreed, but it would match the physical intuition for how inset shadows work. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2010 21:01:00 UTC