On 07/27/2010 11:29 AM, divya manian wrote: > > The reason I posted here was I think it is practical to have inset > box-shadow ON TOP OF the image rather than below the image, despite > what the spec says. I think for image elements inset box-shadow is not > practical otherwise. inset box-shadow would be of great use if only > for this issue. > ... > My view is, the spec should be altered to allow image to show below > an inset box-shadow when an inset box-shadow is specified on the image > element. There is no use-case for the other case where the inset > box-shadow is behind the image. That's an interesting point. Perhaps it makes more sense for the inset shadow to be on top of the content in *all* cases, not just for replaced elements? ~fantasaiReceived on Tuesday, 27 July 2010 18:46:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:48 UTC