- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:56:45 -0700
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: >> In any case, >> by the time you're throwing around 300px blurs, you're certainly not >> caring about the exact extent. > > Why? > > What makes blurs special such that the extent parameter is only interesting at < 300px? The fact that they're blurry, mainly. And they're not really used for precise layout purposes, so a shadow blurring to insignificance 10px shorter or longer than you expect when it's extending 300 or 400px out already is almost certainly unimportant. ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 24 July 2010 20:57:37 UTC