Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)

On 7/22/10 1:18 PM, fantasai wrote:
> Proposed text to handle floats and to treat abspos elements as having
> placeholders per
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009May/0213.html>:
>
>> | For the purposes of these rules, the following terms are defined:
>> |
>> | consecutive
>> | Two sibling boxes are consecutive if they are both in flow and have no
>> | intervening in-flow siblings other than, optionally, an anonymous
>> inline
>> | containing only white spaces. A sequence of sibling boxes is
>> consecutive
>> | if each box in the sequence is consecutive to the one before it in the
>> | sequence.
>>
>
> Remove "they are both in flow and" and "in-flow" from the definition
> of "consecutive".

> | For the purposes of these rules, out-of-flow elements are represented
> | as inline elements of zero width and height. Their containing blocks
> | are chosen accordingly.
>
> I believe this is sufficient. bz, is it correct?

Seems good to me...

-Boris

Received on Thursday, 22 July 2010 18:39:06 UTC