Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects) from Boris Zbarsky on 2010-07-21 (www-style@w3.org from July 2010)

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:26:06 -0400
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4C4676DE.1000308@mit.edu>

On 7/21/10 12:21 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> I'm confused.  Your algorithm explicitly ignores abspos elements (and,
> accidentally I think, floats).  If it's already been accepted, then my
> making it slightly more explicit shouldn't be controversial

I objected to the abspos part at the time as well, for what it's worth. 
  From my point of view the differences between the two proposals are 
purely editorial + the float issue.

-Boris

Received on Wednesday, 21 July 2010 04:26:40 UTC