Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)

On 7/21/10 12:21 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> I'm confused.  Your algorithm explicitly ignores abspos elements (and,
> accidentally I think, floats).  If it's already been accepted, then my
> making it slightly more explicit shouldn't be controversial

I objected to the abspos part at the time as well, for what it's worth. 
  From my point of view the differences between the two proposals are 
purely editorial + the float issue.


Received on Wednesday, 21 July 2010 04:26:40 UTC