W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: Issue 138 proposed text

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:18:49 -0700
Message-Id: <91AA3D5A-8C57-4B11-A36B-213E693A732B@gmail.com>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>

On Jul 16, 2010, at 5:44 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> When such an inline box is affected by relative
> positioning, the relative positioning also affects the block box
> contained in the block box."
> 
> (The only change is an addition of 5 words at the very end.)

Isn't the second to last word supposed to be "inline"?

Received on Saturday, 17 July 2010 02:19:58 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: Issue 138 proposed text"
Previous message: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: Issue 138 proposed text"
In reply to: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: Issue 138 proposed text"
Next in thread: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: Issue 138 proposed text"
Reply: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: Issue 138 proposed text"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:48 UTC