W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: [css3-background] Where we are with Blur value discussion

From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:58:04 -0700
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Message-id: <4373D54E-5730-419D-A4A2-27709E999E6F@me.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:52 AM, Brad Kemper wrote:

> On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Simon Fraser wrote:
>> Surely this isn't an argument in favor of this behavior for blur? The "outward blur only" behavior does not have to have any special discussion for the handling of odd values for the blur amount, but "entire blur region" does.
> It does seem to me that an odd number of blur pixels should be possible.

I think you'd be hard-pressed to tell the difference between a 1.5px and 2px shadow, and at larger shadow sizes the difference would certainly not be noticeable.

Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2010 15:58:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:48 UTC