- From: Eric A. Meyer <eric@meyerweb.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:51:40 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
At 5:46 PM -0700 7/12/10, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>On 7/12/10 2:29 PM, Eric A. Meyer wrote:
>> At 5:32 PM -0700 7/10/10, Brad Kemper wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 10, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> But while it may not fit everyone everywhere, it still sounds like a
>>>> reasonable compromise
>>>> Between 'support forever' and 'take out that prefix asap'.
>>>
>>> Right. Something in between is fine.
>>
>> I can agree with that. I'd prefer "forever" for legacy support reasons
>> but it's not a hill I'd be willing to die upon.
>
>But you and Brad want different things to be supported. You want
>support for an alias for the unprefixed property, whereas he wants
>versioned support of all versions of the prefixed property the
>browser has implemented.
If we could settle on one or the other, would that mean we'd
cleared the last hurdle? Or even the last major hurdle?
--
Eric A. Meyer (eric@meyerweb.com) http://meyerweb.com/
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2010 00:52:13 UTC