- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:01:05 -0700
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, Adrian Price <adrian.price@rogue-technologies.com>, David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 7/12/10 12:51 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > I think the underlying issue here is: when does a browser vendor make their > platform declare support for a feature ? This is fundamentally the "when does the browser vendor drop the vendor prefix on the feature implementation?" question, right? > Thus what we ideally want is a clear, verifiable criteria for a UA to claim support. > For instance: the spec/feature is in CR, the testsuite for the spec/feature is > stable, an implementation report has been submitted showing the browser passes all > current testcases for the feature. Again, sounds a lot like the vendor prefix situation.... (except for that bit about test suites, of course, as demonstrated by the availability of unprefixed display:run-in in the UAs that implement it, for example). -Boris
Received on Monday, 12 July 2010 20:01:43 UTC