- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:29:12 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Yuzo Fujishima <yuzo@google.com>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-style@w3.org, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On 07/12/2010 12:06 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:51:00 +0200, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com> > wrote: >> Yuzo Fujishima wrote: >>> I believe it would help readers if the specification explicitly >>> states how characters must be normalized, how glyphs are chosen, and >>> what is left for UA's discretion. >> >> I agree. It's not a simple task so if you have specific suggestions >> for wording that would be very helpful. > > I don't think we currently require normalization anywhere else. In fact, > there is probably JavaScript code out there that assumes nothing is > normalized. That's true, but font-matching is not quite as simple as matching string characters against a set of available Unicode characters. Each grapheme cluster needs to be rendered entirely in a single font. If different characters in the grapheme cluster map to different fonts, it needs to be clear how to resolve to a single font. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 12 July 2010 07:29:58 UTC