- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 21:00:44 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: "Eric A. Meyer" <eric@meyerweb.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] > I think if the spec went back for a fixed set of changes, and is > expected > to return to CR soon, then those features that were in the CR need not > be > re-prefixed. Exactly. In other words, the background section remains in a CR state. So does border image. But it would be fair to say that box-shadow is not yet ready for unprefixed support in a browser release. IE9 is still at the platform preview stage so we are still able to go back to an -ms state if necessary. Opera, however, has already released the bare version. > > However if the spec is pulled from CR for a major rewrite (e.g. CSS3 > Text), > then its features should be prefixed. I hope we will not need to do > that > to other specs in the future, though. Strongly agree.
Received on Saturday, 10 July 2010 21:01:43 UTC