Richard Fink wrote: > Ok, there's a fair case to be made for an expiration. Never say "Never". > But why should one release cycle be the trigger? I'm sorry, but that seems > kind of arbitrary, if not solipsistic. If dropping the prefix is to be tied to release cycles, why not make the number cycles before dropping it be proportional to the number of release cycles during which the prefixed version existed? RobReceived on Friday, 9 July 2010 16:47:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:48 UTC