- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:03:14 +0100
- To: Adrian Price <adrian.price@rogue-technologies.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Adrian Price wrote: > I apologize if this is an issue that's been raised before - I was amazed It has; many times. > that various searches didn't turn up anything - but is there any plan Sounds like you need a better search engine. > for functionality within CSS to select for browser support for a given > feature or feature set? CSS3 Media Queries allow selecting for screen Part of the problem is that browser vendors will be economical with the truth. Marketing people always have an over-optimistic view of the compliance of their product, and will always give themselves the benefit of the doubt in borderline cases. Also, changing the compliance statement, to remove false claims that are exposed, is likely to a very low priority for the developers. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2010 21:03:56 UTC