- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 17:58:34 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2010 00:59:38 UTC
Brad Kemper On Jul 7, 2010, at 11:08 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: >> A new article on ALA about vendor prefixes in CSS, by Eric Meyer: >> http://www.alistapart.com/articles/prefix-or-posthack/ > > Heh, I was going to post this to the list as well. ^_^ > > Eric's justification for vendor prefixes matches my own thoughts > exactly. I like the vendor prefixes for exactly the reasons he gives, > and similarly think that a unified prefix is a horrible idea. Agreed. I thought it was interesting that he mentioned the raging debate about shadow blurs, as that one seems most in danger of becoming unprefixed while still largely inconsistent (esp. if MS follows the current spec and no one else does).
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2010 00:59:38 UTC