- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 23:34:20 -0700
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > On Jul 6, 2010, at 10:33 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: >>> Note that the spec currently says: >>> >>> "a shorthand property: If all the parts of a shorthand can be animated, then interpolation is performed as if each property was individually specified." >>> >>> but I don't think this is correct. >>> >>> The way WebKit implements this is if *any* part of a shorthand can be animated then it will be, and this works both ways. >> >> I thought we were making all properties animateable, so that >> properties that didn't have special animating behavior just >> floor/ceiling'd their transition function (I forget which way we >> decided right now). >> >> In that case, the distinction is irrelevant, and in fact the line >> itself is no longer needed. > > I think that's orthogonal to this question. The issue with shorthands, I think, is whether the author expects individual properties to animate when shorthands are used in transition-property, and when the individual properties as changed via shorthand rules. Ah, sure. In that case, yes, of course they do, and the webkit behavior so far as I understand it is correct. If the spec doesn't support that currently, it's wrong and needs to change. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 06:35:12 UTC