- From: Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:24:41 +0000
- To: "Sylvain Galineau" <sylvaing@microsoft.com>,"Stephen Zilles" <szilles@adobe.com>,"www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Agreed with Sylvain. Not a red herring, nor is linkable documentation. I still think they (the use-cases) need to be documented somewhere easily searchable/findable/linkable/iteratable (like a wiki page). And no, an email message is insufficient (poor search, linking, zero iteration/history/diffs). Tantek -----Original Message----- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> Sender: www-style-request@w3.org Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 23:59:09 To: Stephen Zilles<szilles@adobe.com>; www-style@w3.org list<www-style@w3.org> Subject: RE: [CSS21] Issue 149 - px vs. pt > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Zilles [mailto:szilles@adobe.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:42 PM > To: Sylvain Galineau; tantek@cs.stanford.edu; David Singer; www- > style@w3.org list > Subject: RE: [CSS21] Issue 149 - px vs. pt > > I think the "use case issue" is a red-herring. That is, I think the use > cases are clear. I thought so too. But after we agreed to same solution *twice* we are being told we should go for a different one based on use-cases so it's not so unreasonable to ask what they really are.
Received on Friday, 2 July 2010 00:25:08 UTC