- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:33:14 +0100
- To: "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: <w3-style@boblet.net>, "www-style" <www-style@w3.org>
We coudl, but it would be confusing and problematic, since not every author read the spec, and most of them will not understand the 'transparent' "bug". I think it would be preferable to add a special case in the spec. BTW, rgba(a,b,c,0) is the same colour as rbga(0, 0, 0, 0). So the UA's may compute (a,b,c,0) as (0,0,0,0), leading to the same problem. -------------------------------------------------- From: "David Singer" <singer@apple.com> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 4:24 PM To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> Cc: "François REMY" <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>; <w3-style@boblet.net>; "www-style" <www-style@w3.org> Subject: Re: CSS3 transition strangeness when using background-color:transparent; > Alternatively, we could have a note in the spec. warning about this, and > suggest that you transition from a color of (a,b,c,d) to (a,b,c,0) if you > want to avoid the a->0, b->0, c->0 transitions as well, couldn't we? > > On Jan 29, 2010, at 15:21 , Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> I agree that that would probably be a useful special-case, because the >> color of transparency is always a confusing thing. >_< >> >> Of course, if an author changes to rgba(0,0,0,0) specifically, it >> should indeed transition on all components, and darken as it fades. >> > > David Singer > Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. >
Received on Friday, 29 January 2010 15:33:45 UTC