- From: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:51:17 -0800
- To: W3C Emailing list for WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 01/25/2010 05:25 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > Both the Candidate Recommendations [1] and the latest editor's > > draft [2] currently state: > > > > "It is not defined what these transitions look like, but a gradient > > is recommended for color transitions that don't involve dotted or > > dashed borders." > > I'm not comfortable with normatively requiring a particular gradient > form or a particular type of corner join in css3-background. I don't > think we have clear answers as to what would look best--other than it > should be a type of conic gradient--so I want to leave implementations > free to experiment. It's fine IMO to leave this detail of border > rendering undefined in CSS3: it gives it a chance to evolve as > implementers learn from each other and from author feedback. As an immediate practical problem, conic gradients are not a widely available drawing primitive. They're not in Postscript or PDF *at all* as far as I know, which means they're not in Cairo, and I didn't find them in a cursory look at the Windows and MacOS drawing APIs either. It's probably not that hard with OpenGL shaders if you know what you're doing, but I wouldn't know where to begin. (Paging Andrew F: how'd you implement them in Sciter?) zw
Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2010 17:51:51 UTC