- From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <kde@carewolf.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:00:13 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Sunday 24 January 2010, MURAKAMI Shinyu wrote: > Hi, > > Yuzo Fujishima <yuzo@google.com> wrote on 2010/01/22 11:02:53 > > > Suppose that > > there is a block-level element just before the end of body > > and that > > the element has page-break-after:always property. > > (See an example below.) > > > > Should the pages break there? In other words, should a content-empty page > > follow the penultimate page? > > > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-page/#forced-pg-brk says: > > no content-empty pages are generated by page-break properties, except for > > at most one content-empty page as may be required by ‘right’ and ‘left’ > > values to position ensuing content on a right- or left-facing page. > > > > Although the above line is for when multiple page-break-* properties > > apply at a margin, > > it seems to be a good general guideline. > > > > I believe vast majority of users don't want a content-empty page at the > > end. > > I agree with you. I also believe the page-break-before:always should not > generate a blank page at the beginning of a document. > I also agree. If there already is a page-break then page-break-before:always has no additional effect. I wauld treat the beginning of the document as an existing page-break. Similar A page-break at the end of the document would extend the document height to the bottom of the last page but not including a new empty page. `Allan
Received on Sunday, 24 January 2010 11:00:45 UTC