- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:08:31 -0800
- To: Simetrical <simetrical@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>, www-style List <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 10 January 2010 19:09:07 UTC
On Jan 10, 2010, at 4:51 AM, Simetrical wrote: > I don't think you're ever going to educate all web authors that "12pt" > is unsuitable for the web when it works just fine in Word. Yeah, but that doesn't matter, because those sites have fixed widths that were designed to look good on a 20" monitor (or at least an 800px-wide one), so they are going to look bad on a dumb-phone anyway, or look fine on mobile Webkit. > I strongly > suspect that most people who use point sizes don't even know that a > point is 1/72 of an inch, and have just developed an intuitive > understanding of what various point sizes mean based on their > experience with word processors. If they have a background in print design, then they would more likely know, which is probably what made them choose points as a type measure.
Received on Sunday, 10 January 2010 19:09:07 UTC