On 1/4/10 5:07 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: > Let's say you have some text that cruises the boundary of a first-line > pseudo-element. Why should the ::text pseudo-element be more restricted > than an actual element, such as a SPAN or a B? The latter is not able to cross the boundary of a :first-line pseudo-element without actually being an inline. Thus the styling on elements which can cross the boundary of first-line is non-arbitrary. I suppose one could do ::text processing before dealing with first-line and first-letter, and that might make things similar enough... > I don't know why, given that you can do arbitrary styling on other > elements that cross the boundaries of first-line. As a matter of fact, you cannot. See above. > The restriction on not crossing element boundaries was intended to make > it less complicated and easier to implement. I suspect that restriction might be needed simply to get it defined in an unambiguous way, fwiw. -BorisReceived on Monday, 4 January 2010 22:26:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:42 UTC