W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2010

Re: [CSS3-text] pixel positioning of underline (was text-underline-position and superscript

From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:01:46 -0800
Message-ID: <4D18E29A.9040404@jumis.com>
To: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>
CC: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, "Belov, Charles" <Charles.Belov@sfmta.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 12/27/2010 1:10 AM, Ambrose LI wrote:
> 2010/12/27 Koji Ishii<kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
>> I think that’s a clear and good design choice font vendors have made. I hope you agree with this, but even if you don’t, you still have an option to use text-underline-position:under.
> I don't think I can call that a real option, since there's only one
> option to choose from. And it's too late to fix anything now.

 From the HTML5 <canvas> realm: I could really access to baseline 
positioning metrics.

As of this point, I'm not really able to set two differently sized fonts 
onto one shared baseline, in a run of text.

So, while we're talking about (and apparently shooting down) the idea of 
adding support for arbitrarily set baselines,
per CSS units, I'd like to point out that I could really use support for 
getting baseline calculations, much like getting other computed styles.

-Charles
Received on Monday, 27 December 2010 19:02:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:54 UTC