W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2010

Re: Feedback on Image modules

From: Anthony Ricaud <anthony@ricaud.me>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:01:35 +0100
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <CE039170-2E11-49AB-A693-D9F09E781140@ricaud.me>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Le 17 déc. 2010 à 12:57, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> I'm also not really convinced this functionality is needed. In practice user agents will have to support the same image formats and similar fallback scenarios have never worked out. (E.g. <object> was a complete failure.) I don't think we should add this.
@font-face seems like a successful fallback scenario. Right now, you can embed EOT, OTF/TTF, SVG, WOFF and rely on the fallback mechanism to let browsers only download the first format supported.

Same goes with <video> and <audio>
Received on Friday, 17 December 2010 14:02:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:54 UTC