W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2010

Re: [css3-background][css3-images] background-repeat: none and extend

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:31:13 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTinMuUgPMuWc9TD=CB1Fea_PbrR3PGUk1H4aE4Oz@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am in favor of 'background-repeat:extend' (which for raster file images would be the same as 'background-repeat:no-repeat'). Can it just be added to the images spec under a heading like "Gradient Extensions to 'Background' Properties", so that it doesn't have to wait for a full B&B4 module, and can be moved along the same track as gradients et al?

That would be okay, though not ideal for purity reasons.

> Is there any need for 'extend-x' and 'extend-y'? I wouldn't think so, but maybe you've ideas about that.

Those values are theoretically consistent, but I don't think they're
useful.  I wouldn't add them.

Received on Thursday, 16 December 2010 00:32:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:54 UTC