- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:03:18 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On 12/15/2010 01:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > I think this all seems reasonable. I wasn't aware that we'd agreed to > name documents without numbering until they're stable. We didn't. We resolved that modules should rev independently, and that they should be named accordingly as CSS Foobar Module Level N. We have a couple of problems in this respect: 1. A number of modules are prefixed with 'css3-' for historical reasons, even though they are not Level 3 of anything. E.g. CSS Namespaces and CSS Template Layout. This is technically fixable: if we want, we can resolve on this and ask webreq to make the appropriate changes in the shortnames. (Webreq might not be happy with us about it, but it's certainly possible.) 2. It's shorter and easier to write CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders than CSS Backgrounds and Borders Module Level 3 (the full, formal name), so we do it all the time. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 15 December 2010 22:04:02 UTC