- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:14:46 +0100
- To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- CC: wai-liaison@w3.org, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Michael, We discussed the current css3-background hiatus in our last CSS WG conference call. The answers fantasai gave to your comments on the 24th of feb 2010 [1] and the 27th of oct 2010 [2] are the official positions of the Working Group, as minuted here [3]. We never received a response from you or your Group related to these edits/answers. See here [4] the timeline of PFWG comments and answers from our WG reps. We hope that it will be enough to address your objection on the specification and that we'll be able to make the document move forward along the REC track in the coming days/weeks. Could you please make sure this is discussed during your forthcoming WFPG conf call? Thanks! [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0229.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0829.html [3] http://www.w3.org/mid/4D06C04E.7020409@inkedblade.net [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2010Dec/0004.html Best, </Daniel> -- W3C CSS Working Group, Co-chair
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2010 21:15:20 UTC